When considering a double surgery, many people wonder whether they should choose the "natural adhesion" method or the "implantation" method. Both procedures are very popular and each has its own advantages and disadvantages. Here, we will explain the differences between the two in an easy-to-understand manner and provide information to help you determine which is right for you. For those who are unsure of their choice in terms of duration, risks, and cost, we support you in finding the best treatment method for you through detailed comparisons.
Graduated from the Faculty of Medicine, National Kumamoto University. After serving as the director of major beauty clinics in Japan, etc., he opened Aladdin Aesthetic Clinic in 2023. He is a professional in aesthetic medicine with a doctorate in anti-aging research and many years of experience. With the motto of "Toward the realization of cosmetic medicine without lies," he aims to be the "Only One" together with his patients.
What is the Natural Adhesion Method? Explaining the difference from the implantation method
The natural fixation method is a revolutionary technique that combines the advantages of the implantation and incision methods. After making an incision of several millimeters in the eyelid and removing excess fat and muscle, a double fold line is formed using ultra-thin medical threads developed for cardiovascular surgery.
Since adhesion occurs in the incision area, the line is more difficult to remove and lasts longer than with the implantation method, which uses only threads to hold the incision in place. It is popular as the best method for those who place importance on the design and durability of the double-exposed eye.
Rough differences between natural adhesion and implantation methods
| (data) item | implantation method | spontaneous attachment process |
|---|---|---|
| Treatment Method | Easy to embed threads in several places | Attachment of the eyelid to the elevator muscle through a complex series of threads |
| finish | Natural finish in a short period of time | Stronger, longer lasting, natural and wider double widths are possible. |
| down time | short | Slightly longer than buried |
| durability | There is a risk of thread loosening, and the durability is short. | Long-lasting effect, stable double line |
| additional effect | Easy and quick to create a double fold. | Sagging eyelids due to aging can also be improved. |
The implantation method is a very easy procedure that forms a double fold by simply implanting threads in several places in the eyelid without using a scalpel. Because it does not involve incisions, the procedure takes only 10 to 15 minutes and requires only a few days of downtime.
Because of its ease of use, it is very popular, especially among teenagers and people in their 20s. However, the disadvantage of the implantation method is that the threads are fastened to the eyelid at "points" (e.g., two-point fastening), so there is a risk that the threads may loosen or come off in the long run, causing the double-layered line to collapse. This may not last as long, especially for people with thick eyelids or those who are in the habit of rubbing their eyes frequently.
In contrast, the natural adhesion technique involves a small incision and is more durable than the implantation technique, making it easier to maintain a double fold line over a long period of time. The most important feature of the natural fixation technique is that unlike the implantation technique, which uses a "dot" of thread, the eyelid and the blepharoplasty muscle (the muscle that lifts the eyelid) are intricately threaded and attached to each other. This adhesion firmly holds the double fold line in place, allowing for a wider double width or a parallel double fold design, as well as improving the appearance of sagging eyelids due to aging.
In addition, the natural adhesion method allows the tissue to adhere, making the double fold line more stable and less likely to be removed. This is a great advantage in that it can accommodate wide double-width or parallel double-lid designs, which are difficult to achieve with the implantation method. In addition, the sagging of the upper eyelids that accompanies aging can be improved, allowing the patient to maintain a beautiful double-exposed eyelid even as they age.
The difference between the right people and the wrong people.
The natural adhesion method is recommended for those who can afford downtime, have thicker eyelids, and more fat. Because it involves an incision, it is best suited for those seeking a double fold that has long-lasting effects and is difficult to remove.
On the other hand, the implantation method is suitable for those who want to recover quickly or want a quick and easy double-exposed eyelid. The flexibility of the implantation method, which can be undone by removing the threads, makes it suitable for those who are considering their first double-layered surgery or for those who want a natural-looking result in a short period of time.
Thorough comparison of natural adhesion and implantation! Which is easier and more natural?
The natural adhesion method is a technique in which a small incision of a few millimeters is made in the eyelid to remove excess fat and muscle to create a double fold line. Prior to the procedure, the ideal double fold design is confirmed through a consultation, and a treatment plan is developed according to the individual eyelid condition.
During the actual procedure, local anesthesia is used to reduce pain in the eyelid and incisions are made. Then, a medical grade ultra fine thread is used to secure the double fold line and wait for the tissue to naturally heal. As the adhesion progresses, the threads are less likely to come off, allowing for long-term maintenance of the double fold.
Advantages and disadvantages of natural adhesion and implantation methods
| treatment method | Advantages | demerit |
|---|---|---|
| spontaneous attachment process | High durability, line does not easily fall off, ideal for people with thick eyelids | Long downtime, postoperative care is important, difficult to reverse |
| implantation method | Easy, quick, little downtime, reversible | Risk of line breakdown, short duration, unsuitable for people with thick eyelids |
The main advantage of the natural adhesion method is its longevity. Because the double fold line adheres to the tissue, it is maintained for a longer period of time and is less likely to be removed than with the standard implantation technique. In addition, the line after the procedure is more defined and there is less risk of the double fold losing its shape. The natural fixation method is an ideal option, especially for those with thicker eyelids and more fat, and for those seeking more stable results.
There are, of course, disadvantages to the natural adhesion method. First, the downtime is longer than with the implantation method. Because small incisions are made in the eyelid, postoperative swelling and internal bleeding are likely to occur, and it may take several weeks for the eyelid to fully recover.
In addition, because the surgery involves incisions, postoperative care is important, and a certain level of risk management is necessary to maintain a stable double fold. For example, problems may occur depending on infection and wound healing, and revision surgery may be required if the results are unsatisfactory.
Furthermore, because the natural adhesion method is a more advanced procedure, the cost is a little higher than the implantation method, and it is not as easy to perform. In addition, because the incisions are fused together, it is difficult to undo the damage, and in some cases, a separate revision surgery may be required if the patient wishes to have a single fold again after the procedure.
On the other hand, the implantation method is a very simple and easy way to form a double fold on the eyelid using threads. After designing the desired double fold line before the procedure and administering local anesthesia, the threads are implanted into the eyelid using a fine needle. Since no scalpel is used, the double fold can be created without damaging the eyelid, unlike procedures that involve incisions. The procedure itself takes only 10 to 15 minutes, and the patient can often go home the same day. There is little downtime after the surgery, and a quick return to daily life is a major feature.
The advantages of the implantation technique are its ease of use and short recovery period. The procedure takes very little time and requires only a few days of downtime, making it especially attractive to busy people and first-time double surgery candidates. In addition, the threads can be removed to return the eyelids to their original state, making it suitable for those who want to try the procedure casually and for those who desire a natural-looking result. Another major advantage is that once the swelling of the eyelids goes down after the procedure, the result is very natural, so it is difficult for others to notice.
However, the biggest disadvantage of the implantation technique is that there is a risk that the threads may loosen or come off and disrupt the double fold line. In particular, frequent rubbing of the eyes or thick eyelids can cause the threads to loosen and the double fold to come off. Although there are individual differences, the effect of the implantation method is estimated to last 2 to 5 years, which tends to be shorter than that of the natural fixation method. Therefore, for those who wish to maintain a double fold over a long period of time, there is a higher possibility of revision surgery.
In addition, the implantation method may not produce a clean line if there is a lot of fat in the eyelid or depending on the shape of the eye area. Therefore, if you have thick eyelids or if your eyelid structure is complicated, the implantation technique may not be suitable for you. The disadvantage of the implantation technique is that its effectiveness is limited by the condition of the eyelid.
Which is better for a natural finish?
If natural-looking results are important, the natural fixation method is the best choice. The implantation method uses threads to hold the eyelids in place at "points" and is characterized by relative ease and short downtime, but the result is limited in naturalness because of the bite into the eyelids.
On the other hand, the natural fixation method uses "lines" to secure the eyelids, allowing the eyelid skin and eye-opening muscles (upper eyelid muscles) to naturally attach to form a more natural and defined double-exposed eyelid.
The natural adhesion method, in particular, allows the adhesion to progress over time, and the double-lid line is established more naturally. Although swelling occurs immediately after the procedure, after recovery, the result is very natural, and even thick eyelids can be accommodated without problems, which is a great advantage.
The implantation method is another surgery that can easily create a double-exposed eye, and the swelling goes down in a few days to create a natural double-exposed eye, but there is a risk of the line loosening, so the natural fixation method is more recommended for those who are concerned about long-term stability and the naturalness of the finished product.
Risks and side effects of natural adhesion and implantation methods
Both are chosen by many, but each has its own characteristics in terms of risks and side effects. Here we will compare the risks and side effects of both methods and explain in detail which one can reduce the risks.
Risks and Side Effects in Spontaneous Adhesion Methods
Because the natural adhesion technique involves a small incision in the eyelid, as mentioned above, swelling and internal bleeding may occur after surgery. The swelling may continue for several weeks and take time to completely heal. There is also a risk of infection of the incisions, and if the eyelid tissue does not heal properly, the double line may not form as it should.
Prolonged swelling and internal bleeding
Risk of infection
... The line may not be as expected.
Insufficient adhesion at the incision site and collapse of the line
Furthermore, since the natural adhesion method can be considered a highly skilled procedure, an experienced physician can minimize the risks, but inexperienced skills increase the risk of failure. Another possible side effect is that it is difficult to undo because of the incision.
Risks and side effects in implantation
Because the implantation method does not involve incisions, there is less swelling and internal bleeding after surgery. While it has the advantage of short downtime and the ability to return to daily life within a few days after the procedure, there is a risk that the threads may loosen or come off. In particular, thick eyelids and people who habitually rub their eyes can easily dislodge the threads, which may require revision surgery.
Loose or detached threads
Double lines disappear
Risk of exposure of threads (thread balls)
Foreign body sensation or discomfort
In addition, the threads may be visible inside the eyelid, may feel foreign, and in rare cases may be exposed. The use of threads may also cause unnatural biting of the eyelid, so care should be taken for those seeking a natural-looking result.
Which is the key to reducing risk.
If you want to reduce the risks, it is important to choose the best option for your eyes and lifestyle. While implantation is easy and has short downtime, making it suitable for first-time bifacial surgery candidates and those who want to achieve results in a short period of time, the risk of thread loosening should be considered, and regular maintenance should be performed.
On the other hand, the natural fixation method may seem risky because it involves an incision, but once the fixation is established, it can be expected to have a long-term effect, and its great advantage is that there is little risk of the double fold line breaking down. For those who desire a wide double fold line or a parallel double fold, the natural fixation method will provide the ideal result with minimal risk.
summary
The natural adhesion method and the implantation method each have different characteristics, and choosing the right procedure for you is the key to a successful bifacial surgery. By fully understanding the effects and risks, and by thoroughly consulting with a specialist, you will be able to achieve ideal results with greater peace of mind. For both procedures, making an informed decision after a preliminary consultation is the best choice for achieving a satisfactory result.
At Aladdin Aesthetic Clinic, based on our many years of experience in cosmetic medicine and cosmetic dermatology and the knowledge of our doctoral degree, we provide counseling that aims to be "only one", offering the best treatment for each person we meet. We offer only the necessary treatments without any unnecessary information or suggestions.
Feel free to use our official LINE account for 24-hour counseling and reservations. Please feel free to contact us for free counseling for the first time or if you have any concerns.
EN 
JA 
ZH 
ZH_TW 
KO